Comments on: Our water into wine experiment http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm Using Your Thoughts to Change Your Life and the World Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:56:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: layal http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5523 layal Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:57:06 +0000 http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm#comment-5523 Symbols and Figures of Divine Thought The Writer: Z.Sana The Writer Z . Sana who wanted by fate to push his spirit since his childhood to seek the real reason which pushes his little friend to commit suicide as he mentioned in his first book '' The eye of spirit and children '' . With the growth of his consciousness , the topic of the research transferred to disclose the real causes of the birth of '' the child who kills '' which is one of the biggest problems faced by western countries . During his research , the writer could find the digital system of Arabic language . By thanks of this new knowledge and experience gained in the interpretation of symbols and figures . The writer could reach to the logic of the divine thought which helped him to see all the reasons of the birth '' the child who kills '' . In the '' Symbols and Figures of the Divine Thought '' , the writer is trying during his explanation and studying of this phenomenon to present different topics and through them the writer is unifying the material and human science to produce new science in addition to the sciences of the present era . He reveals the real miracle of the holy books which concealed by God from the eyes of the senior people to make it clear today and seen by present scientists who most of them do not believe in the existence of God , also to prove that the logic of the modern scientific method is a weak logic and unable to gain access to the truth . In addition , this logic was one of the most important reasons for the arrival of the humanity to the present era which described by history books '' the humanity did not know brutality more than the brutality of the twentieth century man '' . The writer through his showing different topics is breaking the law of the random vision which the present scientists depended on their various researches . He uses the overall vision and presents each event from several points of view to reach to the complete truth . He uses '' woman '' as a representative of a real person . He did not use '' man '' as the present scientists did . During the studying and explanation of the characteristics of woman , he reached to a new theory that '' the origin of human is a part of the spirit of God which symbolized as a18 . The topics of '' The Symbols and Figures of Divine Thought '' are complex and complicated , so his ideas are presented in a simple way . By this way , the writer is trying as possible as he could to convert his work to a simple book that is understood by any person in a secondary education . Symbols and Figures of Divine Thought
The Writer: Z.Sana

The Writer Z . Sana who wanted by fate to push his spirit since his childhood to seek the real reason which pushes his little friend to commit suicide as he mentioned in his first book ” The eye of spirit and children ” . With the growth of his consciousness , the topic of the research transferred to disclose the real causes of the birth of ” the child who kills ” which is one of the biggest problems faced by western countries . During his research , the writer could find the digital system of Arabic language . By thanks of this new knowledge and experience gained in the interpretation of symbols and figures . The writer could reach to the logic of the divine thought which helped him to see all the reasons of the birth ” the child who kills ” .
In the ” Symbols and Figures of the Divine Thought ” , the writer is trying during his explanation and studying of this phenomenon to present different topics and through them the writer is unifying the material and human science to produce new science in addition to the sciences of the present era . He reveals the real miracle of the holy books which concealed by God from the eyes of the senior people to make it clear today and seen by present scientists who most of them do not believe in the existence of God , also to prove that the logic of the modern scientific method is a weak logic and unable to gain access to the truth . In addition , this logic was one of the most important reasons for the arrival of the humanity to the present era which described by history books ” the humanity did not know brutality more than the brutality of the twentieth century man ” .
The writer through his showing different topics is breaking the law of the random vision which the present scientists depended on their various researches . He uses the overall vision and presents each event from several points of view to reach to the complete truth . He uses ” woman ” as a representative of a real person . He did not use ” man ” as the present scientists did . During the studying and explanation of the characteristics of woman , he reached to a new theory that ” the origin of human is a part of the spirit of God which symbolized as a18 .
The topics of ” The Symbols and Figures of Divine Thought ” are complex and complicated , so his ideas are presented in a simple way . By this way , the writer is trying as possible as he could to convert his work to a simple book that is understood by any person in a secondary education .

]]> By: Damiano Cosma http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5518 Damiano Cosma Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:49:15 +0000 http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm#comment-5518 Hi Lynne, after 19 days my friends are still waiting ... You told us to wait for the certainty of the outcome, but measure the pH and the temperature does not require many days ... all persons involved in the experiment I continue to ask about and now think that the experiment has failed because of too late in providing the data? Post Scrittum I have tried several times (including the friend request in power of ten) to get in touch with your coaching staff (or even the University of Arizona) for their support in the experiment which I groped my - your blog ET LIFE ... you can help me help me .. Cosmas and Damian .--- mail to "damianoge@libero.it ---- Many thanks Lynn Hi Lynne, after 19 days my friends are still waiting … You told us to wait for the certainty of the outcome, but measure the pH and the temperature does not require many days …
all persons involved in the experiment I continue to ask about and now think that the experiment has failed because of too late in providing the data?

Post Scrittum I have tried several times (including the friend request in power of ten) to get in touch with your coaching staff (or even the University of Arizona) for their support in the experiment which I groped my – your blog ET LIFE … you can help me help me .. Cosmas and Damian .— mail to “damianoge@libero.it —- Many thanks Lynn

]]> By: Gentle http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5499 Gentle Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:05:40 +0000 http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm#comment-5499 In my opinion, the power of intention is very real in the sense that we can sway events to one way or another outcome. However, to suggest that we can "move mountains" or manipulate physical objects with our intentions, and that if we can not yet do so, it is not that there are very real physical limitations, but because we didn't truly believe...well that's a really powerful kind of dogma that is, I think, dangerously misleading. So, I say believe in your selves people. Don't be conned. These kind of experiments should be performed, not by journalists but real respected scientists who believe it worthy enough to wager their reputation on. Please think about it. G In my opinion, the power of intention is very real in the sense that we can sway events to one way or another outcome. However, to suggest that we can “move mountains” or manipulate physical objects with our intentions, and that if we can not yet do so, it is not that there are very real physical limitations, but because we didn’t truly believe…well that’s a really powerful kind of dogma that is, I think, dangerously misleading.
So, I say believe in your selves people. Don’t be conned. These kind of experiments should be performed, not by journalists but real respected scientists who believe it worthy enough to wager their reputation on.
Please think about it.
G

]]> By: Achala http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5496 Achala Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:33:34 +0000 http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm#comment-5496 I am VERY disapointed. I am used to like Lynne's work. But this is NOT a scientific experiment at all. Prior to the experiment PH was around 7. Why it takes so long to check ph of the water after the experiment? I got an email from the site saying in two weeks they are doing a control experiment. But to check the PH of existing ones doesnt need WAIT TILL control experiments. I guess the experiment results are not as expected. But it doesnt mean intention doesnt work. Please publish results. I have alraedy decided not to participate in any more experiments through this site. I am VERY disapointed. I am used to like Lynne’s work. But this is NOT a scientific experiment at all. Prior to the experiment PH was around 7. Why it takes so long to check ph of the water after the experiment? I got an email from the site saying in two weeks they are doing a control experiment. But to check the PH of existing ones doesnt need WAIT TILL control experiments. I guess the experiment results are not as expected. But it doesnt mean intention doesnt work. Please publish results. I have alraedy decided not to participate in any more experiments through this site.

]]> By: joe http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5483 joe Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:00:18 +0000 http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm#comment-5483 The intention experiment is Bullshit. You do an experiment and then....nothing. Where are the results? I used to be interested in Lynn's work but you hide behind a smokescreen of BS and links to buying something. I am unsubscribing. The intention experiment is Bullshit. You do an experiment and then….nothing. Where are the results? I used to be interested in Lynn’s work but you hide behind a smokescreen of BS and links to buying something. I am unsubscribing.

]]> By: P http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5467 P Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:28:19 +0000 http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm#comment-5467 Any chance of getting the results published? I'm disappointed that there is nothing on this site about the results at all, surely there must be something to report about? Any chance of getting the results published?

I’m disappointed that there is nothing on this site about the results at all, surely there must be something to report about?

]]> By: Tom http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5462 Tom Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:49:57 +0000 http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm#comment-5462 where are the results? where are the results?

]]> By: Terry Moro http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5447 Terry Moro Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:35:47 +0000 http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm#comment-5447 The instructions were very concise and I didn't encounter any difficulties. I get that turning water into wine was a metaphore for changing the water ph however, my mind had some fun with that idea. I look forward to the results. The instructions were very concise and I didn’t encounter any difficulties. I get that turning water into wine was a metaphore for changing the water ph however, my mind had some fun with that idea. I look forward to the results.

]]> By: Deborah http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5446 Deborah Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:44:35 +0000 http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm#comment-5446 I am looking for the actual scientific results of the Experiment and cannot find them. Is there a link I am missing somehow? I am looking for the actual scientific results of the Experiment and cannot find them. Is there a link I am missing somehow?

]]> By: Richard http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm/comment-page-1#comment-5445 Richard Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:10:03 +0000 http://www.theintentionexperiment.com/our-water-into-wine-experiment.htm#comment-5445 Hi everyone, There is something which has been bugging me for sometime regarding these experiments. Sorry if it has already been discussed but basically it harks back to Lynne's book 'The Field'. On page 139 it describes how two people attempted to influence a RNG by getting significantly more heads than tails. They both succeeded in influencing the RNG but one of them had the opposite effect i.e. more tails than heads. Following over 100 further tests that individual consistently had the opposite effect on the RNG. If this was extended to the whole population then there maybe quite a large number of people who do get opposite results. You must have come across many people who get the opposite of what they intend. Could this have a significant impact on these experiments i.e. one we are not intending ? Is there any help to determine whether you might be in one category or the other ? Can you change this ? Should anyone taking part in these experiments who believes they might fall into the 'opposite' category refrain from doing so ? Hi everyone,
There is something which has been bugging me for sometime regarding these experiments. Sorry if it has already been discussed but basically it harks back to Lynne’s book ‘The Field’. On page 139 it describes how two people attempted to influence a RNG by getting significantly more heads than tails. They both succeeded in influencing the RNG but one of them had the opposite effect i.e. more tails than heads. Following over 100 further tests that individual consistently had the opposite effect on the RNG. If this was extended to the whole population then there maybe quite a large number of people who do get opposite results. You must have come across many people who get the opposite of what they intend.
Could this have a significant impact on these experiments i.e. one we are not intending ? Is there any help to determine whether you might be in one category or the other ? Can you change this ? Should anyone taking part in these experiments who believes they might fall into the ‘opposite’ category refrain from doing so ?

]]>